a "tolerant man" to come to their defense if they find themselves assailed in an improper manner.
In the opinion of this "tolerant man" all Mr. Stephan had to do was let himself be heard in order to dispel public prejudice. This man's wish was fulfilled when this past Sunday a public sermon was held, however it did not produce the prophetized result and the public's "preconceived notions" remained unchanged even through the priests did everything in their intellectual power to convince us that the members of this community were being treated as responsible human beings and free men.
Since the "tolerant man" had attempted to raise the hopes of the public concerning the character of the clerical superiors, I believe it is appropriate to render a candid verdict after having heard the voice of the prophet. The undersigned delivers his verdict as follows:
1. Instead of hearing fine oratory, he found merely less than inspired rhetoric concerning those issues so important to the speaker.
2. It occurred to him that the prophet had made a laughing stock of himself by comparing himself to Abraham and offering a prayer for the well being of the beloved ministerial superiors.
3. In the opinion of the undersigned, he considered the speaker an inconsiderate man for his insults about our German fatherland. There can be no comparison between conditions back in the old homeland and what he hoped to find here.
In conclusion the undersigned will bring it to the attention of the
|